With all due respect, this review is cheeky. Of course, the extension is just a tool and you should always check what you delete. Common sense tells you that. In the end, the reliability of the result depends above all on the website's servers and the stability of your own Internet connection. The fact is that not every website allows you to query its availability automatically, and not every internet connection can cope with a large number of simultaneous requests. However, you have this problem with every extension of this type without exception. In fact, the Bookmarks Organizer is so smart that it handles this better than many comparable extensions. And finally, for cases that cannot be checked, there is firstly a whitelist, and secondly, problems with certain bookmarks can be reported at any time so that I can put them on an internal list and they no longer provide false results for anyone - which you have not done. Instead, you just throw out the worst rating, even though the extension does exactly what it can do. And, by the way, experience has shown that the vast majority of users don't get that much false results. But, as I said, it depends on external factors, and it simply cannot be completely avoided.

Also, "websites that are now HTTPS instead of HTTP" will never be treated as errors by the Bookmarks Organizer, that's just not true. Calling this extension "useless" without providing any meaningful feedback for the developer is a really bad behavior.

That's sad.

What you write is not possible at all. You always have the full control of your bookmarks. It's technically not possible that you have to uninstall the add-on to delete your bookmarks or to do anything else with your bookmarks.

Please ask for help instead of giving bad reviews for no reason.

With all due respect, this review obviously only serves the purpose of devaluing my work. All the features are known before installation and nobody would install the extension if they didn't like it. No, the extension won't slow down the computer. The Internet speed, yes, because the extension has to open many bookmarks at once to check them. This is how EVERY extension of this type works, without exception. To say that features like detecting broken bookmarks have no value is nonsense. Because that is the main function for which an estimated 99.9 percent of all users use this extension. It is also strange that with almost 14,000 active users, you are the only one (!) for whom it is supposedly not possible to continue using the computer.

I'm always grateful for constructive feedback, but none of what you write is really tenable.This has nothing to do with construtive feedback, this is only defamatory.

Dir müsste selbst klar sein, dass das nicht normal sein kann. Wieso man dann das Bewertungssystem missbraucht statt einen Fehler beim Entwickler zu melden, erschließt sich mir nicht. Folgendes sind Tatsachen:

- Es ist bei mir nicht eine einzige Fehlermeldung eingegangen, was das MINDESTE sein sollte, bevor man jemanden schlecht bewertet.
- Es passiert nichts und Firefox stürzt ab sind zwei komplett unterschiedliche Symptome. Und von beidem höre ich nach so vielen Jahren an dieser Stelle zum allerersten Mal überhaupt.
- Wenn Firefox abstürzt, ist das ein Problem von Firefox, nicht der Erweiterung. Die Erweiterung kann nicht für die Stabilität des Browsers verantwortlich gemacht werden.

In einer Sache gebe ich dir recht: Schade. So eine Vorgehensweise finde ich wirklich sehr schade. Da opfert man seine Freizeit, um anderen Nutzern kostenlos etwas zur Verfügung zu stellen, und wenn etwas nicht wie gewünscht klappt, wird erst einmal schlecht bewertet statt konstruktives Feedback an den Entwickler zu geben. Das motiviert nicht gerade, weiterhin kostenlos Dinge zur Verfügung zu stellen.

Instructions for what? You just have to press one button. And I got zero (!) bug reports for the current version. So even if you say you have a problem it's clear that you didn't report anything to me. Please don't abuse add-on ratings for support but contact me on GitHub to get help. This kind of behavior is to blame when developers stop providing free add-ons for Firefox.

That's not true - It *is* shown where bookmarks are stored. And yes, the duplicates mode is limited but it's a) not the primary focus of this add-on and it's b) already clear *before* you install the add-on - there are screenshots showing the features. So I don't understand the reason for such a bad rating. The half is not true and the other half is not a surprise.

It's not a matter of add-on options. For me it works with thousands of bookmarks like a charm. Of course add-ons like this (and any othe broken bookmarks checker!) work better with a stable internet connection. If your internet connection is not able to handle many requests at the same time it will lead to more false negatives. That's the nature of such add-ons. As such it's seems a bit a unfair rating to give only one star.

The only known case for such a thing was when bookmarks were added when a bookmarks check was already in progress. That's fixed in Bookmarks Organizer 4.0.

Of course you can delete duplicates, it always was possible. Can you please test again with a current version and re-review? Thanks!

There was no "decision" to stop. I accept pull requests. Everyone is invited to contribute.

There is no WebExtension API at all for tags. And what you described about tags is documented in the description of the add-on. If you don't read the description that's your fault, not the developer's fault. It's not okay to give a bad review just because you didn't read.

It's also not okay to tell it was not tested on a large number bookmarks. I have more than 5,000 and it works for me.

It is not really slow if you think about it how the Bookmarks Organzier works. While I could make a few changes to make it a bit (not a lot!) faster if would mean that the quality of the results could no longer be the same. From a quality POV the Bookmarks Organizer has the most advanced algorithm to determine if bookmarks are still valid or not. We talk about bookmarks. I think false results are really bad for bookmarks. That's why I used an quality-focused approach.

Giving only one star just because it hasn't all the features you would like to see is a very bad way to interact with an add-on developer. There are no surprises at all, I described in detail what this add-on offers. So if it's not enough you could could know it before you installed the add-on. One star makes sense if the add-on does not hold what it promised but that's really nothing you could say about this add-on.

FWIW, I accept pull requests for enhancements and new features.

Mit Verlaub, aber das ist GELOGEN. Der Bookmarks Organizer löscht niemals von alleine Lesezeichen. Der Bookmarks Organizer löscht ausschließlich Lesezeichen, wenn du den Befehl zum Löschen gibst. Das ist ein Fakt. Es ist vom Code des Bookmarks Organizers her technisch gar nicht möglich, dass das von alleine passiert.

No. You can disable the confirmation dialogs in the add-on's settings. Can you please test again with a current version and re-review? Thanks!

Thank you for the feedback. I understand it but it's still hard to give only one star if the scan feature (that's the most difficult part!) does work well.

I hope to find the time for a better multi bookmark UI in the future.

Can you please test again with a current version and re-review? Thanks!

Thanks for the feedback. It's on the roadmap.

I am the developer and I never said something like that. If you're an UI expert please contribute your knowledge or even code. Otherwise please watch your tone and stay respectful to other people who develop thinks like this in their spare time and provide it for free.

The confirmation dialog can be controlled with the keyboard. Please test again with a current version and re-review. Thanks!