Great addon which requires a little more attention and it will be the best!

Wonderful addon. Thank you very much.

got to give it five stars, because each time i used it so far, it worked. made a nice, single, independent offline html file that includes formatting and images.
why firefox cant do this by default with "save page as..." continues being a mystery to me. but this plugin is great.

Worked great for me. All css images are saved too.

Fair replacement for MHT.

Most importantly, this is what page are saved in the format which are accessible for editing. I has turned to SavePageWE because the UnTNT does not work in Firefox v57.

Простое удобное дополнение и очень нужное. Отлично работает.
Thank you for this top tool !

EDIT : Thanks, I give 5 stars back. Webextensions suck :(

Ich verstehe nicht, wieso ich nur einen Stern vergeben hatte. Es sollten 5 Sterne sein!
Es speichert alle Seiten nahezu perfekt. Einen besseren Ersatz für Mozilla Archive Format hätte es nicht geben können!
Bei meinen ca. 60 Add-ons gehört es zu den Top 5 Erweiterungen. (Aktualisiert am Nov. 8, 2018)

thanks, this is a very good addon!!
i have a lot mht format,
i can open it with unmht addon (legacy),
can u help me convert it to "save page we" html format?
until now "save page we" prevent to save mht format to html.
sory for my bad english.
thanks for your effort

Scrapbook is not available, so I'm using this addon.

Thank you for this top tool !

Easy to use to save pages. Feel a little unsatisfied, it's required internet to save(I am using mobile hotspot

I've tried to do something like that. And I know that It's ver hard to do UnMHT analog.
I appreciate this addon.

Great extension. enhance mht format cover to html format is better.

At last! Great 57+ addon for save pages!
Thank You very much!

PS unMHT, Scrapbook, MAFF - all this addons will be discontinued after 14 november 2017. And this Save Page WE addon our last hope for comfort saving pages!)

Simply the best!

I find this tool very neat and useful. It makes saving pages easier, more compact and it can adapt to your needs as well. For example saving a news article resulted in a file somewhat below 700KB, whereas the same page with the Firefox's default save was 5MB overall (plus the additional burden of managing many files). The end results can be hardly distinguished in the browser.

On the other hand with the information I currently possess about this mechanism, I don't think I will be using it as for now, for the following reason:

I'm corcerned as to how other tools (or future tools) that deal with html files will deal with these kinds of giant html files this extension produces, with large binary blobs and scripts embedded (Firefox save produces an html file 700 lines long, this extension: 6700). Encapsulation of data and readability with the classical format may just be too much of an advantage as opposed to the compactness this offers, especially on the long term.
I did a test: I opened the page archived with Save Page and the saved it again but with classic Firefox save. When I reopened that page, aside from the longer opening time, most of the images were lacking and much of the layout was somewhat off. Meaning, even if the visuals can be hardly distinguished, the more can the underlying logic from the perspective of the browser (and most likely from other html parsing tools').

So to sum it up, just as a non-professional in web-dev, I'm having doubts if html format was created for this kind of usage and if it can relatively fairly stand the test of time. For my application this tool, for the aforementioned reasons will not really suffice, nonetheless the engineering is astonishing. In the meanwhile I'm still searching for a tool that focuses its output in one folder and not a folder and a file as Firefox save does.

Perfect for saving web pages and well written.