Reviews for Wikiwand: Wikipedia Modernized
Wikiwand: Wikipedia Modernized by Wikiwand
538 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Rodion Borisov, 2 years agoThis website is too green, and no proper source code addressed. What the hell is with this Wordpress-esque wannabe design? "Upgrade" button that was renamed to "Tell friends". Surely you jest!
Pinterest and few other monopoly buttons in 2022. You're serious? Everything screams Branding Bloat.
Very inconsistent main menu icons and colors. Readability factor is garbage. Incoherent usage of typography and HTML5. Incomplete dark theme.
Many people already told that Wikiwand doesn't respect privacy, and it's easily proven by uBlock Origin. - Rated 5 out of 5by Eugenia, 2 years agoI adore it, makes Wikipedia even more engaging and pleasant to read.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Manmohan Singh Sajwan, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17333746, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15497298, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15088084, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Homayoon, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16963261, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16572602, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16720396, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by ander, 3 years agoWhat a brilliant idea! It makes WP look like a hip magazine. It's much more pleasant and easier to use. I frequently edit WP, and wondered if it might interfere with that. But the Edit command is right there in one of the new menus, and editing session open in a new tab, in the original format. Nicely done! Thanks!
- Rated 5 out of 5by rob, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16631916, 3 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by all9n, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Vedun, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17018200, 3 years agoExcellent addon. Makes Wikipedia look 21st Century web encyclopedia.
- Rated 3 out of 5by Fatyanoor Ashfa, 3 years agoI don't think this is for me - it's so unlike Wikipedia. I did start to appreciate it after trying it for some time (I especially like the nav bar on the left), but I also encountered quite a lot of issues, so I think I'll stick to regular Wikipedia in the meantime.
- Infoboxes look terrible. Images are off-center and the infobox is too close to the body of the article.
- Tables are sometimes split up when they have multiple headers.
- I also think content in tables needs more horizontal padding.
Dark mode certainly needs more work.
- Some elements still have a light background and the light text on it is difficult to see.
- Links in dark mode are gray, which is absurd.
- The text is a bit too bright for me. Either a lighter background or darker text would be easier on the eyes.
- Page previews disappear too slowly when my cursor moves away from it. Waiting for one to go away gets annoying when I'm trying to read the article content.
- The font looks horrid when both italicized and bold.
I understand that some of these issues might be caused by Wikipedia's own architecture, but I'm opting out regardless. - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13641253, 3 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by choual, 3 years agoCette extension n'améliore pas Wikipedia, elle vous redirige juste vers un autre site en s’appropriant le contenu de Wikipedia.. À fuir.
- Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 13318527, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Lucky_Noob, 3 years ago