Reviews for 600% Sound Volume (ads/tracking removed)
600% Sound Volume (ads/tracking removed) by 1fexd
Review by Tiger II
Rated 5 out of 5
by Tiger II, 20 days ago20 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by stevenjoe, 15 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18621390, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by AvHmT, 4 months agoThank you very much for the update. It works very well. FF 115.14.0 esr (64‑bit) in windows 11.
- Rated 5 out of 5by plex, 6 months agomuch better than original, video playback on twitch clips and gofile (among others) actually works now
- Rated 1 out of 5by df gfg, 7 months agodoesnt evfenf uckingwo rk edit: i'm not mad i'm just got a bad keyboard, doesnt work on hulu
- Rated 4 out of 5by Shodaime, 8 months agoprobably good extension. though it stopped rumble.com's videos to work properly. they won't play with this add-on active.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Vandy, 10 months agoDoesn't work properly like the other one. I turn up a tab up and it turns it up but then if I go to change it again it just is at default 100. Also I noticed it doesn't show the tabs that are playing audio.
- Rated 5 out of 5by RED, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by wpeace, a year ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Finnept, a year agoMostly does what it says on the tin and I really appreciate tracker/ad removal from popular extensions but I keep having to reinstall due to 'file not found' errors. Also, needs readjusting every time new media loads into a page or I navigate to a new page - I have to move the volume slider then put it back in the position I wanted to make the volume adjustment kick in again.
- Rated 2 out of 5by TigerNightmare, a year agoI had high hopes for this. On some sites, moving the slider causes the video to restart. A small annoyance, but at least it worked. But after a couple minutes of testing it on various sites, it stopped working. Whenever I clicked on the icon, it would load a 'File not found' page that said, "Firefox can’t find the file at moz-extension://0ce5a5d8-195b-4581-9e31-65875b0c763a/popup/opt-in-en.html." There's clearly some leftover code that references junk from the original extension with no way for me to fix it.
- Rated 5 out of 5by lchanc3, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by steffanossa, a year agotoday i wasted my time by doing what this developer already had done 8-)