Reviews for Block Site
Block Site by Ray
458 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Lizard125, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by mdesch, 3 months agoThis is a powerful, easy, and light-weight add-on. Thank you, Ray, for all the work you have put into creating and maintaining this, not to mention publishing this as open-source where it has such a far-reaching audience that it serves.
****To those with issues, I recommend exporting your config, un-installing the add-on, and then re-installing. Very minimal effort solution that might solve any of the problems you are experiencing. - Rated 3 out of 5by mrg, 3 months agoReverse mode doesn't work in firefox on linux. Simply blocks anything listed in the rules and ignores the setting.
- Rated 1 out of 5by TheWraith, 4 months agoDoesn't work. Block a site such as "bing.com", visit the site - boom, loads just fine. This add-on used to work in years past but it currently doesn't block anything. Avoid this until the developer fixes his code.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18530697, 4 months agothis plug-in doesn't work. just add entries to your host file.
- Rated 2 out of 5by David With It, 4 months agoBloqueia a maioria dos sites, mas depois de um certo "limite", não há mais bloqueios. Testei com deviantart e wattpad e nada.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Antihero, 4 months agoSå gerne, at dette var en integreret funktion i Firefox, men må sige, at denne udvidelse hjalp enormt. Er særligt glad for at jeg kunne tilføje erstatnings-URL - og nu vidersendes jeg til den hjemmeside - jeg forsøgte at søge på i DDG.
- Rated 5 out of 5by CBit, 4 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by isyasad, 4 months agoscheduling does not work, it will either block a site all the time or none of the time. incomprehensible UI
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 12663456, 4 months agoThis blocker was good but now blocked pages etc no longer say they have been blocked and it is no good. Also 500 blocked sites is too low a number. In addition there is no way to contact the developer to discuss these sorts of issues. Shame - it was excellent.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Bytes, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13451261, 4 months agoWorks as intended. Add-on is designed for advanced users so the UI isn't the prettiest.
For those who are having trouble getting sites blocked, make sure Firefox is up-to-date and that you click on the Save Options button if you are on the Block Site :: Options page. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 16843113, 4 months agoIt simply does not work. Sites show as blocked but loads them anyway .Useless
- Rated 1 out of 5by Kxx, 5 months agoIt worked for a while (but after clicking the link in the notification that it's blocked, it was possible to see the site....) but now it doesn't. Like it never existed. I've blocked all possibble addresses for facebook and I can still see the pages. I don't have any schedules, I don't have any additional settings; only as many facebook domains as possible.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Lhetre, 5 months agoUseless.
Tried on 9gag.com, site is shown as long as you don't click on a link on the right.
Tried on imgur.com, site shows as long as you don't change article. - Rated 5 out of 5by Kingfisher, 5 months agoI think that the issues some people have are because you have to press "save options" in order to save your settings. Works great for me.
- Rated 5 out of 5by zutto, 5 months agoThis extension is awesome, especially with its regex system. Thanks for making this
- Rated 5 out of 5by Xarc, 5 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18081624, 5 months agoIt does not block any site. It does nothing when you add the URL to sites to block. Zero Stars
- Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 18246032, 5 months agoIt works exactly as Intended for youtube but freezes when I open Twitter.
I assume this is a glitch but for now 3 stars due to that. - Rated 1 out of 5by Aegis, 6 months agoIt wasn't created with the user in mind. The usability is terrible, the configuration page is counter-intuitive. It's as if somebody actively tried to make it as bad as possible. It doesn't have to be like that...