Reviews for Exif Viewer
Exif Viewer by Alan Raskin
49 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 14657703, 6 years agoEasy to install, but nothing is showed. I browse the hard disk to my files. I open the image. I do a right click and i select exif viewer. Unfortunately the windows is there without any information
Developer response
posted 6 years agoWhere on your hard drive are the images located? Some directories associated with the operating system have restricted access, which prevents the Viewer from retrieving the image and extracting its data. Try copying the images to a public directory and see if that helps. - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14652109, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14565026, 6 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 14464564, 6 years agoУжасно! Часто работает некорректно, ОГРОМНЫМИ буквами выдает какие-то адреса, занимающие 70% первого экрана окна, приодится долго скроллить и вглядываться, чтобы понять хотя бы базовую информацию о снимке, гистограмма во всплывайке над всплывайкой - это вообще угар. Вдобавок оно открывается во всплывающем окне, перекрывающем снимок! Выглядит как приложение из 90-х. Напишите уже кто-нибудь нормальный екзиф для фокса, в хромиумах оно есть же.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 13476299, 6 years agoIPTC-Daten und Exif-Aufnahmedaten werden *nicht* übersichtlich aufgelistet. Unzumutbar.
- Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 14385997, 6 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 12504516, 6 years agoI just upgraded from pre-57 Firefox to 62, and installed the latest version of EXIF viewer, which I've been using for years. The user interface is not as good as the old version, but worst of all, it shows zero information about the image. Nothing at all. The old version showed full details of the same photo, but this new version shows nada. I've uninstalled and reinstalled, and rebooted, but nothing. It's a shame we can't use the old version anymore.
Developer response
posted 6 years agoCan you provide the URL of an image that is not being handled properly? The Viewer should still work, but there have been issues with local files in certain directories. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 14257705, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14103221, 6 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14089545, 6 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 10821312, 6 years ago5/16/2020: Any word on Android? I know that "Search By Image" works on Android.
Works fine on Firefox for Desktop. Doesn't work *at all* for Firefox for Android.
Android works for https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/search_by_image/ . I don't understand why it doesn't work for EXIF!Developer response
posted 6 years agoFirefox for Android implements a very limited subset of the WebExtensions API. So, no context menus and no way to invoke the Viewer. Sorry, but until the Mozilla developers remove this limitation, the Viewer will be DOA on Android. - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14035284, 7 years agoPara ver EXIF de las imágenes, autor, datos de cámara, parámetros de la fotografía... EL MEJOR!!!
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13980062, 7 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13934159, 7 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13744732, 7 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by DeronLJ, 7 years agoVery handy add-on to display a huge amount of detail about an image.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13460881, 7 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13346095, 7 years agoA nice and useful module. Thanks!
However, it would be even better if we could select what type of visualization we want, instead of having to go in a sub-menu to pick one among four presentations (table, basic, etc.). A settings option would be a welcome.
Moreover, it would be faster to parse visually if we could select which attributes to display or hide.
As a bonus, a possibility to override the default CSS would be nice (I'm thinking about lowering the contrast and size of attribute codes), but maybe overkill too! :) - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 13327053, 7 years agoNew version (3.0) cannot be installed, FF says it's corrupt... Please, fix it.
Thanks.
EDIT: Thanks, but it didn't help, my FF ESR 52.4.0 (32-bit) still says it's corrupt. I fixed it by modifying manifest.json (un-commenting "applications" section and changed min version to 52...) Maybe you could make it compatible to ESR too...Developer response
posted 7 years agoI just removed and re-installed it on my system, and it worked fine. A couple of other users were also able to install it without any problems. You might want to try removing it, exiting from Firefox, and then re-installing it from addons.mozilla.org; perhaps the download failed. - Rated 5 out of 5by andrew, 7 years agoThanks for the update!
I have a problem - long time of loading result with large files.Developer response
posted 7 years agoYes.
The "legacy" version could stream the image's binary data a little at a time, since it was able to use the XPCOM interface to access Firefox's functionality.
The WebExtensions version is much more restricted, because it is treated much the same as any web page, and so it has to download the entire image before it can process it.
Out of curiosity, what are your browser's cache settings? I'd hope that the Viewer's request for the image has access to the cache, but maybe not.
- Alan