Reviews for Long Screenshot
Long Screenshot by Firefox user 14541603
Review by nascent
26 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by larley, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by KnuXles, 6 months agoWorks like a charm. Don't know what everyone is complaining about
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14642993, 8 months agoAutoscroll had no problems. It was a nice surprise.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Bekohanfula, a year agoWorked correctly, unlike others, and requires minimum permissions.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Vld, 3 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Katri, 3 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Rex5, 3 years agoJust add option to permanently toggle or tick on the Auto scrolling option. So, every time we don't have to tick the "Auto scroll" tick before taking screenshot.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 11869916, 4 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Marty, 4 years agoDoes not scroll at all. Just takes a screen shot of what is viewable just like prtscrn or taking a screen clipping.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Smacker Jacker, 5 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 15037318, 5 years agoTo the developer:
In outlook.com, if you read an email whose bottom part you have to scroll down, using this addon Page Screenshot, it will screenshot the whole VISIBLE AREA but not the NOT VISIBLE PART that is seen only when you scroll down your email.
What I wanted was an addon that would allow me to get a screenshot in jpg or pdf of not only the visible part of the email but especially also the not visible part of the email that is accessible only when you scroll down to see it.
Therefore, I cannot use this addon because it does not do what its title says "Long Screenshot". The title should be "Screenshot of Only the visible part of the Web Page". - Rated 1 out of 5by isul, 5 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Chris, 5 years agoI was excited about the simplicity of this tool but sad now that I'm seeing it does not actually do a scrolling screen shot. I checked the "scrolling" box but it only captures the visible area of a webpage but I need to capture much more.. Tried adjusting the numbers but same result. If you're able advise how to fix it - let me know and I'll update the rating to 5 star rather than 1. Thanks
- Rated 5 out of 5by Sudip Naik, 5 years ago