работает просто супер!

I've used this extension for years and am perfectly happy with it, except for one thing.

It's probably my PC and not the developer, but the toolbar icon is nowhere to be found. I can use the context menu easily enough, but having that little camera icon on my toolbar was rather comforting in a way.

Firefox 127.0 (64 bit)
Windows 11, version 6.3, sub/build 22631

It would be nice if shortcuts could also be used to take screenshots. Alternatively, it would be useful to be able to take a screenshot with just one click on the extension's icon.

Although it saves a visable area image, it doesn't save entire pages. Trying full-page saving results in corrupt images everytime.

Can't take a screenshot of open dropdown menu options.

Works great!

Decent addon, but it could be _much_ better:


(1)
Disable animation and popup for faster performance - there are better ways to indicate progress without impacting performance which animation and popup does degrade performance.


(2)
Trying to screenshot in AMO, or most other browser-internal pages results in the following error message:
"This page is restricted and cannot be captured."

However, this is not truly the case, as Firefox's default, builtin screenshot tool "Control-Shift-S", actually _does_ allow capturing of AMO and most browser-internal pages.

So, this is clearly not a restriction that cannot be overcome, and so, this should not be a feature-restriction of this addon.


(3)
Add a feature to screenshot _all_ tabs in a window - much like the same feature offered by "Save Page We" and "SingleFile" addons.

This is a feature that fireshot provides, but this a proprietary extension and also requires an external helper application to do this work, and this is also a feature that the user needs to pay for by purchasing a Fireshot license.

So, this feature, if properly implemented, could truly distinguish this addon from other competitors - making it the best screenshoting tool for firefox.

Screenshot is cut into pieces of 30000 pixels height each. Why? PNG size limit is beyond 2000000000 pixels. But may be a great option if there is another practical limit.

But it doesn't stitch together the screenshot seamlessly. All of the document can be read, but there is a visible line every something-hundred pixels.

Awesome tool.

It works great but the size of page that it will save is limited. To save longer pages you will need to reduce the zoom of the page.
For saving a screen size image it's ideal.
For example at %100 zoom on google images it saved down to 15 images. when changing the zoom to %50 it saved down to 37 images, those were very poor quality and the text unreadable.
The normal 'Save Entire Page' (going by how many images were shown on the normal screen size was four) is just short of X4 of the normal screen.
That's what I've found using it on Linux, I haven't used it on Windows so the performance may be better for Windows.
Update,
I still haven't found an easier or more reliable page saver, even when the page is too large to save as a single image, the page will be saved with two images.

Simple but effective extension. Very useful to have a header and footer for url and timestamp ! Its only missing 2 features : a capture of selected area and maybe some formatting capabilities for headers and footers (like change font style and size). Works fine on Linux.

One of the Best!

its not saves entire page ...

does not scroll SPAs

This is the ONLY webpage screenshot tool that's capable of handling huge shots, because it splits up really big ones. All the other tools screw things up and either don't grab the whole thing or just give blanks.

User friendly! Awesome!

Very useful tool when I'm researching my family tree because it enables me to quickly take a screenshot of an entire transcript of a document.

I've been trying a bunch of screenshot tools hoping to find one that is capable of grabbing a huge page. None of them could. Sadly, this one couldn't either, but it came closest. It split the page into two images, which I could easily join together myself, but the first one turned out to be empty. Either way, it's very easy to use, and is really fast too. Hoping this one little bug can be fixed in the future.

Update: the quick fix sent to me by the developer worked great (gfx.max-alloc-size = 600000000). It's perfect now.