Reviews for Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context by Wikiwand
578 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Alexander Mosquera, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Shalom, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Anthony-S6, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by TyrellTheChaotic, a year agoJust absolutely broken. I could no longer use Wikipedia because after a few lines the page would 404.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15552492, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by i18n, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by EchoBreez, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 12148057, a year ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Martijn, a year agoGreat idea, but execution is poor. Has too many issues, distractions (install on firefox banner when you've got it installed...) and weird features. Like how it doesn't play nice with Dark Reader and the useless but very prominent AI summary. For the last couple of weeks every article only has an intro and an "Oops something went wrong: 404" error so I finally switched to Modern for Wikipedia.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 17741600, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17973426, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Claudiu, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17650505, a year agoThis extension should be on every browser on any pc. Period.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Dizzy, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by praveenkathirvel, a year ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by mMm, a year agoUninstalling Wikiwand after years of use due to broken formatting and annoying video ads that pops up (I don't even know if the video is an ad. It just show a woman at a coffeeshop?!). I recommend anyone who uses Wikiwand to compare the pages to the original Wikipedia page because the content does not match anymore. SAD!
- Rated 4 out of 5by odysseyashore, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16935158, a year ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Marc, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Zeo, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by AMC, a year agoI used it for a long time and in the last few months has completely broken, leaving me unable to load Wikipedia at all without disabling it.
They started pushing "AI" based crap into it at the same time.
The structural choices they made with the new layout broke other tools ability to summarize and excerpt articles as well.
After month of breakages and AI marketing ads BS I gave up and moved to Modern for Wikipedia. I would recommend you do the same. - Rated 4 out of 5by Judy, a year ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by 天灭中共退党团队保平安, a year ago