Funktioniert nicht wie gewünscht. Blockt auch Seiten, die deaktiviert sind. Webseiten auf Whitelist hinzufügen geht auch nicht.

This is a good ad blocker but the one thing that I have against it is that it allows "acceptable ads" by default. In my opinion, there is no such thing as an "acceptable ad".

Je ne sais pas

'Allow Ads list' is enabled by default

приложение хорошее только для мощных компьютеров , на старенькие машины ставить нельзя жутко вешает браузер . есть более лёгкие блоки

Old version good

Beaucoup de modules inutilisables sur version de Mozilla.
Pas assez de module pour la présentation (couleur ...) malgré les thèmes.
A créer des modules pour Thunderbird pour des couleurs des mails ou des rangements automatiques suivant l'expéditeur, le sujet ...

Still works fine, but I can't block elements on number of websites anymore; I can only block them on certain ones. Major negative change in functionality. :(

b

This tool is designed to block intrusive advertising. And it does what it says. But when you build a better mouse trap, they will build a better mouse. I learned early that when you thought you had solved the problem, a new problem comes along and replaces the old one. Ad Block plus does a good job at a very special problem. And it's never really let me down.

Fine till sites stopped working. But even removing the program will not stop sites like CBS, NBC, ABC and HULU from not working. You get a message only.

A good ad-blocker but the move to 3.x has removed most of the features that distinguished ABP from other ad-blockers

The developer is still transitioning Adblock Plus to Firefox 57, so much of the functionality has been temporarily compromised. In the meantime, I recommend not upgrading to Firefox 57 or reverting to Firefox 56 and using Adblock Plus version 2.7.1 to restore full workability. Addon rollback works for other addons annihilated by WebExtensions as well. Just make sure to disable Firefox automatic updates and set any Firefox-57-incompatible addons to update manually. Disabling addon compatibility checking and/or addon signature checking through about:config may be required, but I don't believe so.

poco funcional la instalacion