Recensioni per Bookmark Dupes
Bookmark Dupes di Martin Väth
Recensione di What???
Valutata 1 su 5
di What???, un anno faOne star.
Firstly, it does work if you have time and know how to navigate around the complexity of this extension.
It takes approximately 1.7 seconds to delete one single "dupes".
Now, if you have over 13000 duplicates it will take more than 6 hours (with your PC fans whirring) despite the CPU load being at 12%.
Extention doesn't scan ALL your bookmarks (across different folders and subfolders) at once. Even then, it's not detecting duplicate urls within the same folder (most of the time).
In other words, you can have duplicate urls across many different folders but it won't detect them because it can only scan one bookmark folder at a time. There's no option to scan all folders.
There is no real instructions too and it can be very tricky to use. It's overly complex and needs to be simplified.
Firstly, it does work if you have time and know how to navigate around the complexity of this extension.
It takes approximately 1.7 seconds to delete one single "dupes".
Now, if you have over 13000 duplicates it will take more than 6 hours (with your PC fans whirring) despite the CPU load being at 12%.
Extention doesn't scan ALL your bookmarks (across different folders and subfolders) at once. Even then, it's not detecting duplicate urls within the same folder (most of the time).
In other words, you can have duplicate urls across many different folders but it won't detect them because it can only scan one bookmark folder at a time. There's no option to scan all folders.
There is no real instructions too and it can be very tricky to use. It's overly complex and needs to be simplified.
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il un anno fa> how to navigate around the complexity of this extension.
Do not enable "expert mode".
> It takes approximately 1.7 seconds to delete one single "dupes".
If it takes more than milliseconds (in average) to delete a bookmark, something is wrong on your system. It might be running out of memory. A more frequent cause for big latencies is that another tool is interfering, for instance another bookmark extension.
> Extention doesn't scan ALL your bookmarks (across different folders and subfolders) at once
This is incorrect. The name (path) of bookmarks is completely ignored for detecting duplicates (if expert mode is disabled).
> Even then, it's not detecting duplicate urls within the same folder (most of the time).
Two bookmarks are considered identical if their URL is *exactly* the same string. Only in expert mode, you can configure different rules, but this requires that you specify very precisely what you want to consider matching.
> It's overly complex and needs to be simplified
Specifying different rules than identical strings for URLs *is* a very complex problem and can find unexpected dupes especially for apparently simple rules. This lies in the nature of things. That's why "expert mode" is usually not recommended (unless you really understand regular expressions and carefully read the instructions).
Do not enable "expert mode".
> It takes approximately 1.7 seconds to delete one single "dupes".
If it takes more than milliseconds (in average) to delete a bookmark, something is wrong on your system. It might be running out of memory. A more frequent cause for big latencies is that another tool is interfering, for instance another bookmark extension.
> Extention doesn't scan ALL your bookmarks (across different folders and subfolders) at once
This is incorrect. The name (path) of bookmarks is completely ignored for detecting duplicates (if expert mode is disabled).
> Even then, it's not detecting duplicate urls within the same folder (most of the time).
Two bookmarks are considered identical if their URL is *exactly* the same string. Only in expert mode, you can configure different rules, but this requires that you specify very precisely what you want to consider matching.
> It's overly complex and needs to be simplified
Specifying different rules than identical strings for URLs *is* a very complex problem and can find unexpected dupes especially for apparently simple rules. This lies in the nature of things. That's why "expert mode" is usually not recommended (unless you really understand regular expressions and carefully read the instructions).
503 recensioni
- Valutata 5 su 5di 退出党团队远离中共邪教, un giorno fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18018486, 7 giorni faworked perfect to delete 4631 duplicates introduced somehow by some sync problem
- Valutata 5 su 5di ThatNormalBunny, un mese faFound all duplicates and after selecting which ones to delete, deleted them all without any issues
- Valutata 5 su 5di hkpd, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di HighFlyer942, un mese fa
- Valutata 3 su 5di Utente Firefox 18752224, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di shuuji3, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di 无能狂怒气死自己, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Jorge Luis, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Jamie, 3 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18669587, 3 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 17790952, 4 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di hellosociety, 4 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di inmyopinion, 4 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di teorems, 4 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18628471, 4 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di oro1989, 5 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di schlagmichdoch, 5 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di CKA, 6 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18535999, 6 mesi fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Pablo Vieira, 6 mesi faI can see duplicates in front of my very eyes. The addon reports "zero found"...
Reply to developer's reply: I just used "Bookmarks clean up" by itwillnotbeasy and it worked like a charm. You might reconsider your current algorithm. Asking users to enter an "expert" mode AND advising to proceed with care is really bad UX design.Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 6 mesi faAre you sure that they have exactly the same URL, symbol by symbol, up to the very end? Otherwise you might need to use the “Expert mode“ to ignore different aspects of the URL or to use another criteria than the URL to determine duplicates. However, I would not advise you to do so unless you exactly understand what you are doing in this mode, as this might consider much more bookmarks as duplicates than you would like to.
Reply to your reply: By design, the extension does what it says, namely removing duplicate bookmarks. If you want something else - removing *similar* bookmarks - you can get this feature in expert mode; but it lies in the nature of things that this is a very dangerous feature. Especially if you do not understand exactly what is "similar" by the regular expressions you chose, chances are high that you remove bookmarks you actually wanted to keep. If it worked for your use case, that's fine for you, but unless you re-check very carefully manually, chances are high that you remove too much this way. - Valutata 5 su 5di spark9, 7 mesi faPerfectly works as intended. Can't thank the creator enough! Deleted my copied bookmarks AND my empty bookmark folders!
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 14310524, 7 mesi faThis superb tool got my bookmark collection out of a huge mess – a snarl that, as it turned out, contained some 15,000 duplicates, most of which were created by forces unknown to me (presumably bookmarks synchronizers) and a few by my own fumbling. To untangle this snarl, I had to use the tool's "expert mode" and get some help from Martin Väth, its creator, whose assistance was very clear and correct (as is his published documentation of the tool).