Recensioni per DeArrow - Titoli e Miniature Migliori su YouTube
DeArrow - Titoli e Miniature Migliori su YouTube di Ajay (SponsorBlock)
Recensione di Shad
Valutata 5 su 5
di Shad, 6 mesi fa273 recensioni
- Valutata 5 su 5di EliteCanadian, 3 giorni faI created an account with Firefox in order to review this outstanding extension. Ajay, thank you for helping with the overwhelming lack of ethics within "creators"
My favorite part (and the main reason for this review) is that it was a LTT thumbnail that made me reinstall this, Linus's thumbnails are the biggest clickbait, but to see LTT featured on this MAIN SHAMING PAGE, love it.
Highly recommended to anyone that's sick and tired of "creators" abusing their followers. - Valutata 4 su 5di Utente Firefox 18747889, 3 giorni faTells you to activate and there's no option to get free access as the page doesn't work
"An error occurred during a connection to dearrow.ajay.app."
e/ I'd suggest allowing access to addon in some way without connecting to a website so that the addon is usable for people facing similar issueReplica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 3 giorni faIt sounds like something on your network is disallowing connections to dearrow.ajay.app
If you aren't able to use the free access system, try using this key: Fbmzg-7c642 - Valutata 4 su 5di Tyrand, 6 giorni faNot nearly as useful as SponsorBlock.
Perfectly adequate not-clickbait titles keep getting changed into generic titles
Takes too many clicks to downvote a bad title. - Valutata 5 su 5di Killerhurtz, 16 giorni fa15 seconds into the free 60 minute trial and my youtube front page was already so much more pleasant that I sprung for the $1 license.
I expected nothing less from the dev of SponsorBlock :) - Valutata 5 su 5di gorp, 18 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18715530, 23 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di RainbuDeer, 23 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18714554, 24 giorni faVery helpful, you thought of everything and more. I will be donating when I am able to, fantastic work from everyone who worked on this
- Valutata 5 su 5di malau, un mese faIt's by the Sponsorblock guy, so you already know it's going to be good.
The only problem is it relies on people to actually make the effort to change a title - which it seems not a lot of people have bothered to do (so far).
It also relies on the good will of someone who has to be the canary in the cage who watches the clickbait in the first place.
I don't know how open it is to abuse ? Is there something to stop someone (or even a rival channel ?) from just trashing a channel's titles ?
Anyway, a great idea, that will hopefully take off once more people become aware of it. (I only became aware of it because Sponsorblock had stopped working and I had to go to the settings and saw the button for it - so maybe a one time Sponsorblock popup would be a good idea ? ) - Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 13483122, un mese fa
- Valutata 4 su 5di 00yunje, un mese faDepending on who you're subscribed to, this might not make much impact on your browsing experience. Due to titles being crowd-sourced, not every video will be equally affected. Sometimes, the suggested titles can get REALLY pedantic for otherwise perfectly serviceable titles. For example, "The History of The Simpsons Hit & Run World Records" by Summoning Salt became... "The History of The Simpsons Hit & Run (All Story Missions) World Records". Like, that's *barely* more information, and it's stuff I think most people would've assumed anyway from the original title. However, in both cases I've seen this happen, they've reverted back to the original titles soon after. (There's not even a record of there ever being a proposed title, so you're just gonna have to trust me that they were there. I know what I saw.)
Generally, they make the biggest difference with channels like Kurzgesagt or Tom Scott, creators they specifically showcase in the screenshots. Titles can be a bit of a mixed bag for others, but more for the fact that not every video - that might need a retitle - will get them. The generic thumbnail replacer makes the bigger difference to me, imo. It just gives you an honest impression of what each video's gonna look like, literally. And it's nice not having to deal with the obnoxious, gaudy thumbnails people put out sometimes.
Despite the occasionally questionable re-titles, I think the crowd-sourced titles are decent and in good faith. I appreciate the number of guidelines the devs put out to even propose a proper title. It sort of feels like Wikipedia - it might have its vandals, but collectively I think it's in good hands. - Valutata 5 su 5di Tyrone, 2 mesi faAn extremely solid addon that prevents my brain (I have Inattentive ADHD) from falling for clickbait on instinct and titles videos properly for me to tell what they are (I have OCPD).
- Valutata 5 su 5di David Viveros, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di FoxEnjoyer, 2 mesi faGreat extension from a great developer. I paid extra, because I have also been using SponsorBlock for years. Both SponsorBlock and DeArrow are worth every penny.
- Valutata 3 su 5di Anonymous, 2 mesi faEdit: I don't mind if the reminder appears every single time, as long as I have to only confirm once (1 button). But, I don't care how many times the 5 confirmations thing appears, if it does, I'll just cancel. It's THAT annoying to me.
While, I do like this extension. I dislike the new change of having to confirm 5 times before I can submit an altered title. This is significantly detract me from even bothering, it's too much hassle. A single confirmation should be enough to get the message across.Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 2 mesi faThe guidelines reminder does not appear for every submission
It appears the first time you submit, once more a day later, then three days later, then a week later, then once per month.
People have mentioned now knowing the rules thanks to this dialog so it does seem to be working to try to improve the titles being submitted
Edit: If you think it's too much effort to click a few checkmarks once a month, then yea, please don't submit. We do want people putting some level of effort when thinking of new titles - Valutata 5 su 5di RandomAnvil, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Hollytryx, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 14740377, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di deanohl2, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di 3kh0, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 4 su 5di mutie, 2 mesi faI think people should be able to vote without clicking into the video. it would make the system more engaging to incentivize participation, and maybe lead to less low quality changes. Unless you are submitting, judging the quality or annoyingness of a title/thumbnail doesnt require watching it.
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 2 mesi faA title might look correct until you watch the video and realize the video is actually about something else - Valutata 2 su 5di thib, 3 mesi faIt almost exclusively work on channels that do mild and tolerable clickbait, for example Tom Scott
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 3 mesi faThis extension is made for creators who upload good videos but with not so good titles and thumbnails. Tom Scott is a good example of that