Recensioni per DuckDuckGo Privacy Essentials
DuckDuckGo Privacy Essentials di DuckDuckGo
2.238 recensioni
- Valutata 1 su 5di MS130, 3 anni faDropped this search engine when it began censoring what would be shown on searches. Shame on you DDG.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Slope Wallet (chrome port), 3 anni faUsed to be my go to browser, fast and best for privacy. Went down the hole when it announced that it was censoring searches... removed the extension and changed my search engine. Really went downhill.
- Valutata 3 su 5di Utente Firefox 17344845, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Abundant, 3 anni faDuck Duck GOne indeed! We are all moving to Brave and eventually YaCy. We WILL punish you for attempting to corrupt our freedom. You made this bed.
- Valutata 5 su 5di PBrackley, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di FFToph Beifong, 3 anni faF you DuckDuckGone. I could tolerate your shitty and inferior algo in return for privacy and non-biased search results, but then you're becoming like Google/Bing with biased search results, so now you're just a shittier search engine compared to them. F you.
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 15003691, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 17335294, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 17334096, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Swash, 3 anni faTired of being censored? Duck you DuckDuckGo! Censore someone else. Never again!
- Valutata 1 su 5di Wellerstind, 3 anni faDDG no longer respects free speech and targets civilians for their government's wrong doings. Cannot recommend anything by this company, now or in the future unless their CEO/Founder leave the company. He doesn't believe in free speech
- Valutata 1 su 5di BL4CK, 3 anni faUsed to be my favorite seach engine. But since they started judging what is truth and what is not, what i should and what i should not see, there is no reason to use it anymore.DDG used to be about privacy AND FREEDOM (because you can't separate those two thing).
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 13444042, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 10782222, 3 anni faThis site censors search results and is funded by a venture capitalist fund. If I could give DDG a minus rating I would. Don't trust me research it for yourself. There are a couple of search engines on Firefox that are private & not censored: Brave & Presearch.
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 16507600, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 16131795, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Jason DiManna, 3 anni faSwitched from Google originally and really enjoyed. Now public statements of filtering or censoring results disappoints me. Let me be the judge of what is fake news!
- Valutata 1 su 5di Screw the Narrative, 3 anni faMoving to Brave. I don't want my searches to be "prioritized" based on someone else's opinion of what's true or not. See Ya.
- Valutata 2 su 5di Abraham, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 14896160, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 13997341, 3 anni faAfter years of using it im done whit DDG... "At DuckDuckGo, we've been rolling out search updates that down-rank sites associated with Russian disinformation."
- Valutata 1 su 5di Free to Decide 1971, 3 anni faI've been a long-time user and supporter of DuckDuckGo - telling friends and family it's a great alternative to Scroogle's manipulation and data tracking. I created an account today just to write a review and voice my displeasure for DDG's new policy of censorship.
I am an adult with the capacity for critical thinking and judging for myself whether someone has provided sufficient evidence to support their claim. I DON'T need and DON'T want a search provider to cultivate, eliminate, or discriminate the results that show up when I am searching for something.
I can no longer in good conscience support DDG, and will start using a different search provider going forward. They lost my support the moment they decided to censor the free flow of information. Even if they reversed their decision tomorrow, it will take some work for them to earn back my trust and support. - Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 17018431, 3 anni fa