Recensioni per KeePass Tusk - Password Access and Autofill
KeePass Tusk - Password Access and Autofill di Brandon Davis
Recensione di Utente Firefox 14092311
Valutata 5 su 5
di Utente Firefox 14092311, 7 anni faI'm giving it 5 stars, but with two minor crits.
One: you don't include sync.com as one of your cloud providers, which, given that they're probably one of the most secure options available (even they can't access your data) is a shame. I keep my kdbx file in my sync box, but I was still able to add it as a valid option by using the "local file" option. (Like most cloud options, they provide local file access).
And, having added that and my keyfiles, and entered the master password, I duly went hunting for a trial site to test it on. This is where you scored big time. I have been a Keefox user for a couple of years. Up until firefox went quantum and keefox went bananas and ditched the most important functionality in their plugin. I refer to the ability to use the extension simultaneously as bookmark database AND autofill ("Find and Fill" functionality).
If I want to login to one of my email accounts, I just want to type in email and get a reasonably short list of contenders, click on the one that matters, get taken to its login page and have the username and password fields completed automatically. Keefox stopped doing that and made it clear that they weren't even going to try to find a way to do it which would be compatible with the new Firefox environment. Their ludicrous suggestion was that I bookmark the relevant password protected sites. (I have over 800)
But you've done it. And what you've sacrificed to make that possible is entirely rational and makes much more sense than what they've done.
Setting up the username and password for an account is something you (generally) only do once for a given account. But you might visit that account thousands of times. Which would you rather lose - the automatic capture of credentials (a one off) or the automatic "find and fill" option which you'll need forever? It's a bleedin nobrainer!
The second criticism actually cost you a star, until I figured out my mistake and edited this review. You need to make the "remember" option slightly more obviously relevant to the PASSWORD DATABASE. I looked at it and ignored it, (assumed it was site specific instead of relating to the password file) after "find and fill" on my first test site. Went to another and the sodding password file was locked. That was because I'd left the "remember option" on "don't remember" instead of my preference (remember until browser exit).
Otherwise thumbs up
2 observations after a couple of days using it:
1 Displaying the Keyfile name is almost as bad as displaying the password in plaintext. Strongly suggest you hide that.
2 Can we have a way to store preferences (like the "Remember" option above)
One: you don't include sync.com as one of your cloud providers, which, given that they're probably one of the most secure options available (even they can't access your data) is a shame. I keep my kdbx file in my sync box, but I was still able to add it as a valid option by using the "local file" option. (Like most cloud options, they provide local file access).
And, having added that and my keyfiles, and entered the master password, I duly went hunting for a trial site to test it on. This is where you scored big time. I have been a Keefox user for a couple of years. Up until firefox went quantum and keefox went bananas and ditched the most important functionality in their plugin. I refer to the ability to use the extension simultaneously as bookmark database AND autofill ("Find and Fill" functionality).
If I want to login to one of my email accounts, I just want to type in email and get a reasonably short list of contenders, click on the one that matters, get taken to its login page and have the username and password fields completed automatically. Keefox stopped doing that and made it clear that they weren't even going to try to find a way to do it which would be compatible with the new Firefox environment. Their ludicrous suggestion was that I bookmark the relevant password protected sites. (I have over 800)
But you've done it. And what you've sacrificed to make that possible is entirely rational and makes much more sense than what they've done.
Setting up the username and password for an account is something you (generally) only do once for a given account. But you might visit that account thousands of times. Which would you rather lose - the automatic capture of credentials (a one off) or the automatic "find and fill" option which you'll need forever? It's a bleedin nobrainer!
The second criticism actually cost you a star, until I figured out my mistake and edited this review. You need to make the "remember" option slightly more obviously relevant to the PASSWORD DATABASE. I looked at it and ignored it, (assumed it was site specific instead of relating to the password file) after "find and fill" on my first test site. Went to another and the sodding password file was locked. That was because I'd left the "remember option" on "don't remember" instead of my preference (remember until browser exit).
Otherwise thumbs up
2 observations after a couple of days using it:
1 Displaying the Keyfile name is almost as bad as displaying the password in plaintext. Strongly suggest you hide that.
2 Can we have a way to store preferences (like the "Remember" option above)
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 7 anni faHey there! There's a lot here to respond to, but I'm going to try.
1. Sync.com is completely impossible to support. They provide no developer APIs or authentication. It's a shame, but no amount of effort on my behalf will make sync.com work.
2. Making the remember password meaning more obvious is definitely a goal. Actually, a lot of the controls in Tusk need better explanation. I'm pretty much out of space to put anything else on that line, but a hover dialog or something in the wiki is needed... I agree with you there.
3. I disagree that showing the keyfile name is bad. KeeWeb, KeePassXC, and KeePass2Android all do this. The keyfile doesn't provide security by being "obscure", i.e. a secret file on your computer. It provides a second factor of security. You combine "something you know" (master password) with "something you have" (a keyfile) to get strong encryption. Google "security through obscurity" for a great discussion on this topic.
4. Do you mean exporting settings so you can move them between browsers? This would be a great feature, but right now there aren't very many settings to keep track of, so it isn't much of a burden to get set up how you want it. As the settings complexity grows, I imagine this will happen.
Thanks for the detailed feedback and review!
1. Sync.com is completely impossible to support. They provide no developer APIs or authentication. It's a shame, but no amount of effort on my behalf will make sync.com work.
2. Making the remember password meaning more obvious is definitely a goal. Actually, a lot of the controls in Tusk need better explanation. I'm pretty much out of space to put anything else on that line, but a hover dialog or something in the wiki is needed... I agree with you there.
3. I disagree that showing the keyfile name is bad. KeeWeb, KeePassXC, and KeePass2Android all do this. The keyfile doesn't provide security by being "obscure", i.e. a secret file on your computer. It provides a second factor of security. You combine "something you know" (master password) with "something you have" (a keyfile) to get strong encryption. Google "security through obscurity" for a great discussion on this topic.
4. Do you mean exporting settings so you can move them between browsers? This would be a great feature, but right now there aren't very many settings to keep track of, so it isn't much of a burden to get set up how you want it. As the settings complexity grows, I imagine this will happen.
Thanks for the detailed feedback and review!
151 recensioni
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 16795405, 2 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di WildernessFamily, 2 anni faThank you to the developer. I switched from another Password Manager to AuthPass. AuthPass is compatible with KeePass so this extension works with AuthPass! Thank you for taking the time to create this extensions. It's easy to setup and works! Thank you!
- Valutata 3 su 5di Adam Reece, 3 anni faLooked promising, but found that it doesn't support Argon2 key transformation, so unfortunately useless to me.
- Valutata 3 su 5di Utente Firefox 14703913, 3 anni faIt does its job, but I have had a major issue with logging in to my database often:
I need to disable and reenable OneDrive in the settings to be able to log in sometimes. - Valutata 1 su 5di TRR, 3 anni faI didn't realise when I installed but this hasn't been updated in 3 years. I assume that means it's discontinued but there isn't any indication here or on their website. Not comfortable using abandoned security software.
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 5 mesi faTusk is under active development again! Here's the announcement: https://github.com/subdavis/Tusk/releases/tag/v2024.8.2 - Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 17084742, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Lucas, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Georges_Paul, 3 anni faCannot keep a local Keepass file synchronized?! Insta-useless.
Reply to reply: Keeweb does this just fine. Communicates with a desktop app over socket (I'm guessing).Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 5 mesi faThis is a limitation of all browser extensions, not just Tusk. Browsers do not allow extensions to read directly from a user's filesystem. - Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 16931407, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di mao, 4 anni fail top ottimo autofill, speriamo in una implementazione con il lettore di impronte del mac
- Valutata 3 su 5di Hnk, 4 anni faLooks promising. However, nextcloud/owncloud support implies unsecure save of user/password.
- Valutata 5 su 5di PC, 4 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Robert Roygaard, 4 anni fa
- Valutata 3 su 5di Utente Firefox 13296071, 4 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Lapidary, 4 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di refo, 4 anni faThis KeePass extension is perfect for browser, for situation that KeePass was installed portable.
- Valutata 4 su 5di Utente Firefox 16359954, 4 anni faworks almost flawless. bit weird that when opening it. a masterpassword is filled in. not my master mind you. but he. if you replace it. it still works fine
- Valutata 5 su 5di SPGoding, 4 anni fa
- Valutata 2 su 5di TigerDave, 4 anni faJan 2021 Update: Switched to Bitwarden. Works like a charm.
Original review: Was (and still is) working great for my 5 existing PCs, but when I try to install it on any new PCs or VMs, I am unable to connect to and use pCloud.
Error = "Invalid Client ID".
Plus the Add-On now appears to be abandoned. Too bad. It was awesome.Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 5 mesi faTusk is under active development again! Here's the announcement: https://github.com/subdavis/Tusk/releases/tag/v2024.8.2
Glad you're enjoying Bitwarden, I use it too! - Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 15927421, 4 anni faThis was working fine and I would give it 4 stars (there's some improvements that are needed), but now it crashes the browser. Plus it's no longer maintained.
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 5 mesi faTusk is under active development again! Here's the announcement: https://github.com/subdavis/Tusk/releases/tag/v2024.8.2 - Valutata 5 su 5di Rico Liebscher, 5 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Phate01, 5 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 13115996, 5 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 14928627, 5 anni fa