Recensioni per Smart Referer
Smart Referer di meh., Erin Schlarb
Recensione di tama
Valutata 5 su 5
di tama, 3 anni faThanks for great addon!
Just one issue if you have time.
Somehow exception list doesn't seem working for instagram.com, even I put source "instagram.com" and destination "cdninstagram.com".
Firefox inspector still show faked referrer is sent.
Appreciated if you have time to look in.
Thanks.
Just one issue if you have time.
Somehow exception list doesn't seem working for instagram.com, even I put source "instagram.com" and destination "cdninstagram.com".
Firefox inspector still show faked referrer is sent.
Appreciated if you have time to look in.
Thanks.
76 recensioni
- Valutata 5 su 5di Krisna S. Putra, 5 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Lucas S., un anno fa
- Valutata 4 su 5di Utente Firefox 14234915, 2 anni faPlease update the whitelist
https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions#-optional - Valutata 5 su 5di Bryan Hoang, 2 anni fa
- Valutata 3 su 5di kcufuoyeid, 2 anni faIt works for me, for the most part. I saw my firewall logs and somebody else mentioned some shady looking urls:
globalupload.io
gateway.ipfs.io
ipfs.infura.io
gateway.temporal.cloud
gateway.pinata.cloud
cloudflare-ipfs.io
dweb.link
It's crazy to have such checking for updates every startup at 24 hour internals with no way to change this is a bit excessive. I disabled whitelist. downloaded the whitelist , modified it to my own liking and stored it as a local file. This add-on would be vastly improved it had a easier to use and more intuitive interface for managing websites if they break. Last update was 3 years ago so I guess that's it for this add-on. - Valutata 2 su 5di rocksoccer, 2 anni faIt kind of does its job, but as many other reviews mentioned, whitelist is really such a bad idea for most people and most usage scenarios.
I only want to modify the referers for a particular website and that's all. Blacklist will be much better. I know it is not as so-called safe as whitelist, but it will become suitable for much more people. - Valutata 5 su 5di Artyom, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Aa, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Wojox, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di odysseus, 4 anni fa
- Valutata 4 su 5di Novakof, 4 anni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di まさきん, 4 anni fa
- Valutata 4 su 5di Utente Firefox 16037335, 4 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Mofiac, 4 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 13541847, 4 anni fa
- Valutata 4 su 5di Utente Firefox 14392904, 5 anni faIs it really required to use dweb infrastructure to get a tiny whitelist file? My FF shooting a bunch of requests to some shady looking urls:
globalupload.io
gateway.ipfs.io
ipfs.infura.io
gateway.temporal.cloud
gateway.pinata.cloud
cloudflare-ipfs.io
dweb.link
I thought I've got a malware when I saw that in my log files.
And it takes half an hour to figure out the source of suspicious web traffic. - Valutata 5 su 5di Anton, 5 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Сырное, 5 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 15254132, 5 anni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di _ztv, 5 anni faРасширение давно не работает, хватит звездочки ему ставить. Да и белый список давно не обновлялся.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 13386478, 5 anni faDoesn't seem to work. Simple settings in the FF's about:config work, however.
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 13864526, 5 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di GammaGate, 5 anni fa