Reviews for DeArrow - Better Titles and Thumbnails on YouTube
DeArrow - Better Titles and Thumbnails on YouTube by Ajay (SponsorBlock)
46 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18841606, 22 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by yowidin, 2 months agoMakes YouTube almost unusable: adds a considerable delay to every UI interaction. For example pausing or resuming a video takes 5-20 seconds.
Developer response
posted 2 months agoIt seems like another extension might be conflicting. Could you try disabling other extensions? Maybe another extension is also changing video links. - Rated 1 out of 5by malau, 2 months agoThis extension no longer works with Firefox >133. The popup box that asks you to confirm that you are adhering to the 3 main rules is just a blank black box.
When it used to work - 5 stars
To devs reply. Yes, I understand how it is SUPPOSED to work, because it USED to work in the manner you describe. But now I just get a blank black box where the rules SHOULD beDeveloper response
posted 2 months agoThere are four rules. You have to check off each rule at a time. It only happens on your first submission and every few weeks. - Rated 1 out of 5by Th4t, 2 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Hugglesthemerciless, 6 months agoJust had today's Formula 1 race spoiled because DeArrow put the race results as the thumbnail for the race highlights vid instead of leaving the original alone. Never using this garbage again.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Braix, 6 months agoI feel that this goes way too overboard with its definition of clickbait and ends up compromising the artistic intent of some channels. I specifically noticed this on ahoy's channel, where the movie poster like thumbnails and simple names were replaced with lesser quality images and verbose titles. The p90 one specifically is a good example. I could go through and edit the channel specific settings for channels I already know and like, but I fear I could then miss out on channels I have not seen before are. I feel like I would like this extension if there was maybe an option for affecting purely egregious forms of clickbait rather than almost anything that seems eye catching to someone.
Developer response
posted 6 months agoWe do have an exemption for fiction pieces such as short films, but one downside of this extension is that it will end up removing some artistic, and the line of what people think is good vs. bad is really subjective from the many discussions we've had about this.
For now, channel allowlisting is the best you can do, but maybe in the future we can try to make a way to share lists with others so you could follow and contribute to shared lists with people that have similar views. If you have other ideas I would be interested to hear on our discord/matrix. - Rated 1 out of 5by inb4nope, 7 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Greg, 7 months agoA 6-hour trial? This is ridiculous! I installed it, came back the next day to test it, and it says my trial expired. Now I have to wait for approval for free access? This is so unprofessional. Making it free from the start with an option for payment later would be a better approach. I'm really fed up with all the paywalls on Firefox extensions recently! Hopefully, Mozilla will sort out this marketing mess soon!
Developer response
posted 7 months agoYou can do as many trials as you want. Just click start trial again
Edit: Looks like there was a bug making it not appear, this is now fixed - Rated 1 out of 5by nakata1912, 7 months ago
Developer response
posted 7 months agoYou can use DeArrow for free, forever, by clicking "I can't/don't want to pay"- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18531721, 7 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by yellowfox, 9 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by yaxe, 9 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by qwertyuiop, 9 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by FF user 17083219, 10 months agowhat the addon description purposefully omits, is the crucial fact that you cannot in fact use the addon at all, even if you cannot pay. i clicked that option and its still asking me to pay, or wait for a multitude of hours. What is the reason for this other than to annoy and coerce the user? absolute garbage and greed.
Developer response
posted 10 months agoYou can use it for free after waiting a few hours if you do not want or cannot pay, and while waiting, you can use the free trial. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18403227, 10 months agoKNOW BEFORE BUYING:
Don't expect a name to change. In practice, there was a 1% or less change in the names of videos I watched. Enabling DeArrow mostly changed capitalization.
Re-titles are user-submitted only. There will be NO title change unless a user has submitted one.Developer response
posted 10 months agoYou can use the trial to see how much coverage the types of videos you watch have, or share it around with others with similar interests to you to spread it in that community :) - Rated 1 out of 5by Chloe, 10 months agodoesn't work, random thumbnails are showing up completely unchanged. shame that this extension used to work and is now utterly broken
Developer response
posted 10 months agoSend me an email and I can try to help you trouble shoot: dev @ ajay.app
You could also try uninstalling and reinstalling in case it was a config change that caused it - Rated 1 out of 5by Cassie, a year agoomg all the video thumbnails just flicker non stop and slows/freezes the whole browser
Developer response
posted 10 months agoDo you maybe have another extension that affects YouTube thumbnails? - Rated 1 out of 5by intars, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Shellyoung, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by hecatebbb, a year agoRenaming clickbait titles is a good idea, but in practice too many perfectly fine titles are changed to something stupid for no reason. I can't think of a good way to fix this, so I'm going to stop using DeArrow.
- Rated 1 out of 5by That's Cool Jack, a year agoI like the idea but it makes youtube loading sooooo slow, even with extensions like unhook that hides videos from ever being visible, this extension is not compatible
Developer response
posted a year agoTry it again now, there was a server issue at that time that might have been causing it - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17761284, a year agoEDIT: dev response is wrong, i understand what dearrow is, i read the description of the addon before i paid for it LOL. the problem is that it sucks at doing what it says it does for fundamental reasons.
clickbait = "sensational and unappealing packaging (the titles and thumbnails)" and tons of clickbait thumbnails and titles get through dearrow because this addon requires users of an addon who're allergic to clickbait already to willingly submit themselves to enduring low quality content in order to submit a new relevant title and thumbnail and remove said clickbait with dearrow. it just won't happen and prevents the addon from working as intended
dev, i recommend removing the crowdsourcing element of this addon *or* merely asking for donations instead of outright payment. you can't do both and you can't expect people to pay you to do work for you. a refund is actually kind of a ridiculous thing to offer. you want me to hop in your email to beg for a dollar? get real LOL. when you ask for payment you invite criticism and a refund is not relevant.
original review below --------------------------------------
I paid a dollar for this app expecting to remove the clickbait from my Youtube experience but instead most of the actual clickbait (content farm videos with 1mil+ views) continue to appear unaltered while the titles from any even mildly popular genuine video creator get stripped of all creativity and even narratively spoiled in some cases.
the problem is fundamental due to the fact that this app is crowdsourced and because most of the actual clickbait is from channels that are so low quality that even the users of this app don't want to put in the effort to fix it. meanwhile the videos people actually put effort into get neutered because some geek thought the title wasn't definitionally accurate enough.
that's another thing, why are we paying to crowdsource our work? i only realized i was paying to work after i forked it over so shame on me i guess but it certainly left a slimy taste in my mouth afterwards.Developer response
posted a year agoI am happy to fully refund you, send me an email dev@ajay.app
You seem to be looking for something different from what DeArrow is.
DeArrow at the moment is not for filtering and hiding videos that are low quality, but instead of about reducing sensationalism in all videos (the high quality ones too). You seem to be looking for something very different, which is fine.
When I look at my YouTube feed, I see many high quality videos created by great people. The problem is that they are all obscured by sensational and unappealing packaging (the titles and thumbnails).
The goal of DeArrow is to be able to look at that feed of already high quality videos without having to deal with the current sensationalist title/thumbnail trends and know what which of those videos to choose from based on what their actual content is.
I hope that makes the purpose more clear :) - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17051826, a year agoThe page where you can supposedly use it for free is broken due to a conflict with NoScript, and it can't be turned off for that page. Also, the addon page is incredibly misleading, with no indication of being a paid extension anywhere in the description (and no, the "Some features require payment" text is not enough).
Developer response
posted a year agoThere should be a warning that displays if you have no-script to temporarily disable it for that page
If you still couldn't get it working, here is a code :)
FgvPK-ab641