Good looks and a nice font, but in a table the font color stays black, which makes it impossible to read because of the black background.

it's... pretty to look at and read, but that's about it. I was excited to find this, but grew increasingly disappointed. most articles I personally read do not have images large enough attached to the article to not get extremely distorted by the otherwise-nice-looking banner Wikiwand generates, and customization is pretty basic (and no longer matches the screenshots here, unless I'm missing something). I was also not pleased with yet more shoving of AI down my throat. it took three or four times switching it off before it stopped popping up. the deal-breaker for me, though, is the loss of the hover preview for Wikilinks -- apparently, they're supposed to work, but never did for me and I get distracted enough as-is without having to open an entirely new page/tab just to see what the article is about. ultimately, user styles for vanilla Wikipedia serve my needs better.

Very good Layout but ... audio reading should be fixed. 1st the reading velocity is not the one set in windows speech; 2nd, the voice type always reset to the 1st available in the list. E.g. If I choose Susan as my preferred ENG voice, why do I have to re-set Susan voice every time I want to listen instead of David (the 1st in the voices list)? 3rd, the reading voice should start from the top row visible on the screen, not at start of the entire doc.

I don't think this is for me - it's so unlike Wikipedia. I did start to appreciate it after trying it for some time (I especially like the nav bar on the left), but I also encountered quite a lot of issues, so I think I'll stick to regular Wikipedia in the meantime.

- Infoboxes look terrible. Images are off-center and the infobox is too close to the body of the article.
- Tables are sometimes split up when they have multiple headers.
- I also think content in tables needs more horizontal padding.

Dark mode certainly needs more work.
- Some elements still have a light background and the light text on it is difficult to see.
- Links in dark mode are gray, which is absurd.
- The text is a bit too bright for me. Either a lighter background or darker text would be easier on the eyes.

- Page previews disappear too slowly when my cursor moves away from it. Waiting for one to go away gets annoying when I'm trying to read the article content.
- The font looks horrid when both italicized and bold.

I understand that some of these issues might be caused by Wikipedia's own architecture, but I'm opting out regardless.

Cool:
- Having the table of contents always in sight

Uncool:
- takes too long to get the original wiki link for sharing
- WW did not show the "This article is about X, did you mean Y?" message that I would've got in the original Wikipedia

It's all fine and dandy and I really like the new look the addons give. I have two big issues, though: 1) illustration that is used as the cover photo seems to be inaccesible and I quite often need to access the original file to download or cite it, so it is a big problem to me; 2) the search engine does not seem to support Polish wikipedia, so I need to use Google to access it.

This doesn't restyle wikipedia. It just goes to a different site. It would also be better with some subtle backgrounds instead of plain white.

I thought that this would make the actual Wikipedia look better (like a new stylesheet), but instead it just redirects to another website with a different design with the same content.